On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 12:44:32PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Some random questions about this: - How many existing packages are affected? Can this be analyzed and the maintainers notified? - If I want to analyze my own packages to see if they contain rpaths, is it sufficient to run this? chrpath --list --keepgoing <binaries> <sofiles> | grep RUNPATH I ran that on /usr/lib64 and found samba seems to use RUNPATH=/usr/lib64/samba
It's possible to use rpminspect to check RPATH and RUNPATH values. A run I did on a number of packages a few months ago showed we have (or had) lots of things with /builddir RPATH values. In the case of Samba, /usr/lib64/samba can be allowed by adding that to the allowed list in an rpminspect.yaml file locally. Thanks, -- David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
