On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:18 AM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > change proposal replaces that policy with one where, given a good > technical reason, a packager may: > * Choose to build with their package with clang even if the upstream > project supports gcc. > * Choose to build with gcc even if upstream does not support it. > To be clear, does "given a good technical reason" imply that there is some kind of approval process for this? Or that there's a way to object to the compiler usage based on an insufficiently-good technical reason? Or is it just a way of saying "we trust you to exercise good judgment"? -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
