Re: What do we think about always autoreconfing? (was: Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 at 11:27, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hijacking this thread originally about
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271

What is the current thinking in Fedora about always running
"autoreconf -i" during builds that use autotools?

1) "autoreconf -i" is not enough. It needs to be executed "autoreconf -fi" and to have proper visibility reconfigure issues should be executed "autoreconf -fiv"

2) Looks like still no one performed experiment of rebuilding all existing packages with %configure macro in spec by execute:

$ for i in *.src.rpm; do rpmbuild --rebuild -D "_configure 'autoreconf -fiv; configure'" $i; done

To check which Fedora packages are failing in the build environment with autoconf 2.71.

kloczek
-- 
Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux