On 4/7/21 4:16 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 4/7/21 2:21 PM, Tomas Orsava wrote:
On the other hand, I understand where you're coming from: we have
fought battles with unintended use of our tools too (e.g. sudo pip
breaking dnf). But given the scope of the breakage here, I would
advocate for postponing this change for now. It seems none of us is
sure how to square this circle at the moment.
Nod. I'll need to sleep on this all a bit.
There was good feedback and constructive ideas in the PR. I don't have
the energy or the cycles to deal with all this now so I reverted the
%exclude-changes upstream, to be revisited at a better time, along with
some better options for %check.
Thanks everybody for keeping this civil and constructive.
- Panu -
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
