Hi, On Sat, 2021-02-20 at 10:49 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > time and try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be > enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=34 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f34 > \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing- > modular \ > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will > reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf > upgrade` before running this command. I think we should do this exact same test but after Fedora release , For example on Dec 6 2020, I upgrade from F31 to F32 and I had these results [1] I did a dnf distro-sync , but we found some mistakes if we verify why package have lower versions in Fedora n+1 , sometimes maintainer didn't send package to bodhi, other times package it is in updates-testing forever and many other issues. Best regards, [1] libappindicator-0:12.10.0-29.fc31.i686 libappindicator-0:12.10.0-29.fc31.x86_64 libappindicator-gtk3-0:12.10.0-29.fc31.i686 libappindicator-gtk3-0:12.10.0-29.fc31.x86_64 microcode_ctl-2:2.1-39.3.fc31.x86_64 perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0:1.17-1.fc31.x86_64 perl-Type-Tiny-0:1.010006-1.fc31.noarch python2-pillow-0:6.2.2-3.fc31.x86_64 python2-setuptools-0:41.6.0-1.fc31.noarch slirp4netns-0:1.1.6-1.fc31.x86_64 tpm2-abrmd-selinux-0:2.3.1-2.fc31.noarch xawtv-0:3.107-2.fc31.x86_64 Downgrading: baobab x86_64 3.34.0-2.fc32k libappindicator x86_64 12.10.0-28.fc32 libappindicator-gtk3 x86_64 12.10.0-28.fc32 microcode_ctl x86_64 2:2.1-39.fc32 perl-Net-DNS-SEC x86_64 1.12-4.fc32 perl-Type-Tiny noarch 1.010004-1.fc32 python2-pillow x86_64 6.2.2-2.fc326 k python2-setuptools noarch 41.2.0-2.fc32 slirp4netns x86_64 1.1.4-1.fc32 tpm2-abrmd-selinux noarch 2.3.1-1.fc32 xawtv x86_64 107-1.fc32 > If you have have rdma-core.i686 installed you have to pass ` > --allowerasing`. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919864 > > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual > upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, > please report it against the appropriate package. Or > against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 34. Please check existing reports against > fedora-obsolete-packages first: > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" reports: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=F34FailsToInstall > > Thank you > > P.S. sent from workstation successfully upgraded to F34 :) > > -- > Miroslav Suchy, RHCA > Red Hat, Associate Manager, Community Packaging Tools, #brno, > #fedora-buildsys > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
