On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:18 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There is no good way to do this. This is one of those cases where I occasionally miss a mainframe fix update feature to prevent certain bad automated results. In SMP/E, there was the concept of HOLD's for a fix. There were a number of HOLD reasons, but one was ACTION, which prevented the application of the fix unless the HOLD was released. I.e. you had to read the docs and either do, or prepare to do, whatever the ACTION said to do before you could proceed Of course, one could just set up systems to bypass all the HOLDs if appropriate for your use case, but it could prevent certain errors from occurring without at least thinking about the implications of applying the fix. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
