Re: autoconf FTBFS bugs being filed but no obvious build failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

there might be some "false negatives". If the packages are successfully built in the given copr, please close the trackers. In most cases the FTBFS bugs are relevant.

Thank you.

Ondrej

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 1:57 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

eg:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943008
"coccinelle: FTBFS with upcoming autoconf-2.71"

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943041
"ocaml-curses: FTBFS with upcoming autoconf-2.71"

I followed the links given in both, but as far as I can tell the
builds succeeded in both cases.  Unless I'm looking at the wrong thing -
it's hard to tell.

Rich.

--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines.  Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.  http://libguestfs.org

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux