Re: is the license AGPL 3.0 useable in terms of distributing the software as a package?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 24.03.21 um 02:44 schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel:
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
This is the reason why MBROLA is not in Fedora. MBROLA is not new. It is
much older than the 2-year-old GitHub project. The license of the voices
has always been the blocker.
PS: This was already discussed when the GitHub project was created in 2019:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/MAAY3B6KUVAV7YRNUSW7G6672WUAFWYJ/
with the same conclusion. (It is not acceptable for Fedora, unfortunately.)

And, a small correction: according to the Wikipedia article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MBROLA
the license of the software itself did actually change from a non-free
license to the AGPL when the project was imported into GitHub. But
unfortunately, the license of the data files is still a blocker, sorry.


A very helpfull explanation. Thanks.

Best regards,
Marius Schwarz

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux