On Wednesday 01 June 2005 23:16, seth vidal wrote: > > > What about stretching out the dev cycle from 3months dev + 3 months of > > > testing to something more like 6 months of dev + 3 months of testing. > > > > agreed in part. Fedora is ready for a bigger cycle so that more > > fundamental things can get fixed. I don't like 6+3 per se, I'd like 3+3 > > +3, 3 devel, 3 devel+test and 3 test > > Sure - but in total a 9 month release cycle for this rev would take the > strain off of some of us who aren't paid to do this all day. I think we should do only work on infrastructure for FC5 and basically get FC5=FC4+FC4updates+infrastructure in the 6 months timeframe we have. -- http://LinuxWiki.org/RonnyBuchmann -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
