Re: rawhide report: 20050602 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:32:48 -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 07:27:52PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 07:41:54 -0400, Build System wrote:
> > 
> > > gcc-4.0.0-9
> > > -----------
> > > * Wed May 25 2005 Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@xxxxxxxxxx> 4.0.0-9
> > > - update from CVS
> > >   - PRs c++/1016, c++/21686, libfortran/18495, libfortran/19014,
> > > 	libfortran/19016, libfortran/19106, libfortran/20074,
> > > 	libfortran/20436, libfortran/21075, libfortran/21108,
> > > 	libfortran/21354, libfortran/21376, libgcj/21637, libgcj/21703,
> > > 	libgcj/21736
> > >   - fix overflowed constant handling (Zdenek Dvorak, #156844,
> > >     PRs middle-end/21331, tree-opt/21293)
> > > - make sure slow_pthread_self is never yes for linux targets
> > > - fix reg-stack ICE (#158407, PR target/21716)
> > > - fix ICE on fortran alternate returns (#158434)
> > > - fix ICE on fortran functions without explicit type with implicit none
> > >   (#158232, PR fortran/21729)
> > 
> > Since I don't know whether the Fedora Extras buildsys runs this compiler
> > already, I must assume that it does, because Amarok, which built fine some
> > hours ago on i386, fails with many C++ related errors now.
> > 
> > I cannot reproduce it with
> > 
> >   $ rpm -q gcc
> >   gcc-4.0.0-8
> > 
> > and need to wait for Rawhide mirror sync first.
> 
> This compiler is used only for FC5-ish builds ATM, FC4 uses 4.0.0-8.

Damn! :)  When I asked about this on #fedora-extras, I was told the
build system syncs with Fedora Core Development. That had been my
earlier theory. A few hours before, Amarok built fine,

  http://extras64.linux.duke.edu/failed/4/amarok/1.2.4-3/i386/

then it failed,

  http://extras64.linux.duke.edu/failed/4/amarok/1.2.4-4/i386/
  http://extras64.linux.duke.edu/failed/4/amarok/1.2.4-5/i386/

> But if you prove 4.0.0-9 breaks some package built while 4.0.0-8
> worked, please gather details and file a bug report, so that we
> can investigate it to see if it is a GCC or application bug.

My local build fails to rebuild amarok from Fedora Extras FC-4 CVS now, too.

$ rpm -q gcc libstdc++
gcc-4.0.0-9
libstdc++-4.0.0-9

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux