Re: python noarch packaging vs pip install

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08. 03. 21 18:33, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
I'm just wondering: what's the benefit of packaging Python noarch
projects in Fedora?

You can use them as requirements for packaged applications.

I can see the reason about packaging architecture specific packages,
since they will benefit of optimizations and security flags that Fedora
uses, but noarch packages are simply the source code that gets compiled
at runtime by the Python interpreter, aren't they?

In what way is different from installing them by pip? Does packaging
them worth spending resources (disk space, Koji cycles) and packagers time?

See above. If they are required by something, it is necessary.
Packaging leaf libraries as RPMs however indeed brings very little benefit.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux