Re: OCaml 4.12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I also recall there was some discussion about whether we need
> OCaml 4.12 in Fedora 34.  I would prefer _not_ to do this, not only
> because it's another couple of days of work, but also because
> Fedora 34 is feeding into RHEL 9 and it would pull at least one more
> OCaml package in RHEL 9 which I'd like to avoid.  But if there was a
> real reason why we needed it in F34 then let me know.

A RHEL release should really not be the deciding factor on whether something 
is accepted into a Fedora release or not.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux