On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 13:59 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Other tests are kind of random. I mean, what does this mean? > > https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fedora-ci/job/rpminspect-pipeline/job/master/12861/testReport/(root)/tests/ > > Stuff like: > > 1) File /usr/lib64/ocaml/cmdliner/cmdliner.a changed content on x86_64. > > Amazing! The package was rebuilt, what did you expect? The test description does explain this to some extent: "Report changed files from the before build to the after build. Certain file changes will raise additional warnings if the concern is more critical than just reporting changes (e.g., a suspected security impact)." I suspect the types of files that changed here are flagged as being "critical" on the basis that they are effectively ABI, so this is telling you more or less the same thing as the abidiff failure: the update changes the ABI. Note that many other files in the package will have changed, but they're not *all* shown in the test results, just these specific ones. The question here is more "should ABI change-type issues be counted as failures on Rawhide 'updates'?", I think. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
