On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 23:38 +0200, Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote: > ons, 01.06.2005 kl. 22.35 skrev Matthew Miller: > > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:31:32PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > What about stretching out the dev cycle from 3months dev + 3 months of > > > testing to something more like 6 months of dev + 3 months of testing. > > > I'd be willing to work toward that feature. > > > > That would be awesome. And it'd take some of the pressure off of Fedora > > Legacy. > > > Could fedora legacy use the same repourls as fedora core/extras? So that > it would just continue to be "yum update"? I've often wondered why the final update for fedora (before cgoing legacy) doesn't include a switch to fedora legacy as part of it. R. -- "It's a fine line between denial and faith. It's much better on my side" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
