Kalev Lember wrote:
> The glib upstream MR got rejected, which means all consumers are going
> to have to fix their use of glib headers to not include them in an
> extern "C" block.
That is extremely unhelpful. What is the point of rejecting a 2-line (!)
patch that keeps backwards compatibility and avoids having to fix dozens of
other packages, which potentially have this #include in dozens of places
each?
I would suggest applying this patch downstream if upstream cannot be brought
to reason.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
