On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 2:54 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > $ fedpkg clone -B ocaml-ppx-hash > Cloning into bare repository '/home/rjones/d/fedora/ocaml-ppx-hash/rpkg.git'... > remote: Enumerating objects: 26, done. > remote: Counting objects: 100% (26/26), done. > remote: Compressing objects: 100% (23/23), done. > remote: Total 26 (delta 12), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0 > Receiving objects: 100% (26/26), done. > Resolving deltas: 100% (12/12), done. > > $ ls ocaml-ppx-hash/ > f33 > > This is wrong isn't it? Shouldn't either "main" or "rawhide" branch > subdirectories have been created? > > See: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash/branches > > Also I'm a bit confused about the difference between "main" and > "rawhide" - which one should I use for development that happened on > the old master branch? > > Rich. If everything is implemented as approved by FESCo, "rawhide" is the successor for "master", with "main" only being a symbolic reference pointing at "rawhide". Regarding the "f33" issue, that sounds like a fedpkg bug. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
