On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 10:25 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 06:42:58PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim > wrote: > > On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 11:40 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:43:21PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > But that would involve at least six new steps that would've to > > > > be > > > > automated: 1) Creating a fork on src.fp.o (plus error handling > > > > around > > > > already existing forks), 2) Cloning the fork instead of the > > > > main > > > > repo, > > > > 3) Automatically creating a PR after a git push, 4) > > > > Automatically > > > > merging the PR if CI passes, 5) Deleting the fork, 6) > > > > Automatically > > > > building the package in koji ... > > > > > > Yeah, honestly, this is also a pretty serious hardship for the > > > long > > > tail of > > > people maintaining a handful of infrequently updated packages. > > > I'm > > > hugely in > > > favor of not checking in work in progress on the main or release > > > branches, > > > but let's not make more steps. > > > > > Similar to the (optional) playground repo we have for epel8 -- > > would > > having a 'rawhide-playground' repo help? > > With what goals? With the goal to have experimental commits go there, but on further thought forking the package and doing such tests there is probably a better idea. Best regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim profile: https://keyoxide.org/michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
