Re: Proposal to deprecated `fedpkg local`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Dne 27. 01. 21 v 18:21 Gwyn Ciesla via devel napsal(a):

Question; What problem would be solved by removing fedpkg local that isn't addressed by documentation?


It would ensure, that people are using stable and predictable environment for Fedora development, keeping their system intact.

This proposal was triggered specifically by comment from this ticket [1]:

~~~

I still have a workflow issue, because running `fedpkg local`generates a huge amount of files that, in most repositories, are not in `.gitignore`, leading to mistakes like this.

~~~

This is simply not good user experience.


Vít



[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-jekyll/pull-request/4


Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux