On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:06 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Adding normal packages are requirements for a devel package just to make it
> multilib feels... unclean? Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something. In order
> to have the logic self-contained, why don't we add something like
> "Provides: multilib(x86_64, i686)" into affected packages and make pungi
> process that?
Feel free to suggest it to rpm. ;)
Why rpm? Isn't that entirely in our hands, what Provides we assign to Fedora packages and what meaning we give it?
I'd personally just like to drop i686 entirely, but I don't think
everyone else is ready for that.
No no no, I'm not willing to give up my games collection! :-)
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
