On 1/26/21 9:13 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 26/01/21 16:52 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 4:47 PM Jonathan Wakely >> <jwakely@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On 25/01/21 15:16 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: >>> >On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 5:10 PM Jakub Jelinek <jakub@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 02:17:28PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote: >>> >> > We are delaying the mass rebuild by a day as of now due to bugs >>> in gcc >>> >> > and dwz. As of now, we are expecting to start mass rebuild >>> tomorrow, >>> >> > Jan 21st 2021. There is a new build of gcc running currently >>> which has >>> >> > fixes to gcc bugs, but we are still figuring out the dwz fixes. We >>> >> > will keep you posted with any further developments. >>> >> >>> >> Both gcc-11.0.0-0.16.fc34 and dwz-0.13-6.fc34 with the fixes >>> >> are now in f34-build (and in eln-build too with s/fc34/eln108/). >>> >> Those who had their builds fail in the last 2 days because of s390x >>> >> rpm crashes, errors about strip failures of LTO debug sections or >>> dwz >>> >> crashes can retry their builds, sorry for the inconvenience. >>> >> >>> >> AFAIK we are waiting now for boost and maybe binutils. >>> > >>> >boost 1.75 was merged yesterday, and binutils 2.36 was postponed to >>> F35. >> >> (snip) >> >>> >I'm wondering something else: Will automation trigger a "second mass >>> >rebuild" for ELN once all the builds from the Fedora mass rebuild get >>> >tagged into f34? >>> >There's apparently issues with ELN right now, it looks like the base >>> >buildroot is not installable because boost 1.75 builds were done in >>> >the wrong order. >>> >>> Wrong in what way? >> >> Looks like this was a transient issue. koschei is no longer >> complaining about boost. >> The problem was some dependency chain involving rpm-build -> >> source-highlight -> boost 1.73, but it appears to have been a >> temporary problem, if it was a problem at all. > > Possible the ELN buildroot contains gdb-headless which depends on > source-highlight which depends on boost, which causes a bootstrapping > problem (you can't update boost, because then you can't install the > buildroot to rebuild anything else). It might have been solved by > untagging the new boost. I thought that was a problem for RHEL builds, > but maybe it's ELN too. > > The Fedora buildroot appears to contain gdb-minimal instead of > gdb-headless, and that doesn't depend on source-highlight. See: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdb/pull-request/8#request_diff It's on the agenda for the team call today. jeff _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
