On 25. 01. 21 15:49, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
On Monday, January 25, 2021 8:18:33 AM CET Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 1/22/21 8:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 09:57 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 1/21/21 8:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 10:53 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Florian Weimer wrote:
With rpm-4.15.1-3.fc32.1.x86_64, I get this error:
$ rpm -qip
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/aarch64/debug/tree/Packages/m/ModemManager-debugsource-1.14.10-1.fc34.aarch64.rpm
error: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.6iU66n: signature hdr data: BAD, no. of
bytes(88084) out of range error:
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/aarch64/debug/tree/Packages/m/ModemManager-debugsource-1.14.10-1.fc34.aarch64.rpm:
not an rpm package (or package manifest)
Is this expected?
It seems that rpm-4.16.1.2-1.fc33.x86_64 can parse the RPM just fine.
But rpm-4.14.3-4.el8.x86_64 does not like it, either.
Considering that direct upgrades from F32 to F34 (n to n+2) are supposed to
be supported, this sounds like a blocker to me.
openQA N+2 upgrade tests have indeed been running into this for a few
days:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/759545#step/upgrade_run/20
I had been meaning to dig into it a bit more before filing a bug.
Folks, when rpm starts spitting errors like that, don't think, just file
a bug. It's very, very very very unlikely that it's "ok" in any
imaginable meaning.
It's not that I thought it was "OK", it's just that these days I tend
to like filing a bug report with detailed cause analysis and stuff all
wrapped up :)
And that is certainly appreciated!
But if there's even a wiff of a package generational bug, it's better to
act first and think later because those things are not entirely unlike a
virus outbreak, those buggers spread fast on every sneeze and stopping
it early is the key to damage control :D
I'm curious how are we going to fix this? Mock started to complain now that it
is not even able to install rawhide bootstrap chroot on F32:
error: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap-1611584804.803151/root/var/cache/dnf/fedora-2d95c80a1fa0a67d/packages/python3-libs-3.9.1-3.fc34.x86_64.rpm: signature hdr data: BAD, no. of bytes(384156) out of range
Does it imply rebuild of all affected packages, including Python3.9?
Oh my. Can we please re-sign the affected packages without rebuilding them: If
that's not possible, I can rebuild Python 3.9 to unblock the mock bootstrap issue.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
