Re: Backwards-incompatible RPM format change in Fedora 34?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/21/21 5:43 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
That's just not acceptable.
Which means that signed RPM contents need to be postponed at least
until all supported Fedora releases have an RPM version that can read
those files.
I'm not sure what Fedora's policy on this is, but as an administrator
with a mix of Fedora and EL systems, it would be really, really helpful
if RPM in the latest version of EL could parse these RPMS (at least
SRPMS; not sure if they're affected by this change).

--
========================================================================
                 In Soviet Russia, Google searches you!
========================================================================
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux