On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 10:53 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Florian Weimer wrote: > > With rpm-4.15.1-3.fc32.1.x86_64, I get this error: > > > > $ rpm -qip > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/aarch64/debug/tree/Packages/m/ModemManager-debugsource-1.14.10-1.fc34.aarch64.rpm > > error: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.6iU66n: signature hdr data: BAD, no. of > > bytes(88084) out of range error: > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/aarch64/debug/tree/Packages/m/ModemManager-debugsource-1.14.10-1.fc34.aarch64.rpm: > > not an rpm package (or package manifest) > > > > Is this expected? > > > > It seems that rpm-4.16.1.2-1.fc33.x86_64 can parse the RPM just fine. > > But rpm-4.14.3-4.el8.x86_64 does not like it, either. > > Considering that direct upgrades from F32 to F34 (n to n+2) are supposed to > be supported, this sounds like a blocker to me. openQA N+2 upgrade tests have indeed been running into this for a few days: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/759545#step/upgrade_run/20 I had been meaning to dig into it a bit more before filing a bug. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
