On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:49:51AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Hi Oliver and others, > > I'm trying to fix a few things in Fedora's libdnet and have some > questions. > > (1) I'm unclear what the canonical upstream of libdnet should be. > There seem to be a couple of candidates: > > https://github.com/boundary/libdnet - not updated since 2016 > https://github.com/ofalk/libdnet - recently updated > > The current spec file points to the "boundary" repo, but I think we > should move to Oliver Falk's apparently more active fork. I meant to ask if Oliver's version is still API compatible. The real reason we have libdnet is because of open-vm-tools, so if it breaks open-vm-tools then we'd have to stick with the "boundary" version. > (2) If we move to the ofalk repo, then there is a new version (1.14). > > (3) I received a bug report about multilib conflicts with this > package. I previously fixed this > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/342001), but my fix was reverted, > apparently by a bad revert commit: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libdnet/c/224a9645782f69ae05b0e7caeb2e52e12b5655cb?branch=master > > I would therefore like to include the multilib fix again. > > Please let me know your thoughts on all this. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
