Re: Fedora 34 Change: Signed RPM Contents (late System-Wide Change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12.01.2021 21:20, Brian C. Lane wrote:
Who is going to use this feature? My guess is a very limited set of
users, so it seems unfair to dramatically increase the size of their
downloads and install footprint to support something they don't use.
Can't they be shipped on the side? An rpm of signatures that's
optionally installed would be more user friendly.

+1. I think a separate -signature subpackage in a separate repository (as already done with -debug{info,sources}) would be better.

If the user needs per-file signatures, they can enable fedora-signatures repository and install all of them (a dnf plugin can be created to automate this process).

--
Sincerely,
  Vitaly Zaitsev (vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux