Marek Kasik wrote: > Thanks for pointing me to this fork, I was not aware of it. I've > prepared my own pull request already: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/diffpdf/pull-request/1 > > Looking at it now, it seems that CI failed for it. I'm going to have a > look at that. You probably don't have all the changes required for the Qt 5 port covered. The Debian package: https://packages.debian.org/sid/utils/diffpdf has a patch against the last upstream version to make it support Qt 5. But in the long run, I think switching to the maintained fork is the way to go. Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
