Re: Fedora 34 Change: Scale ZRAM to Full Memory Size (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:14 AM ElXreno <elxreno@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Does this reduce your concern?
> In a way, yes. Most of the time memory will be compressible, I agree,
> but there are non-compressible data, and I'm only concerned about that.
>
> In my opinion, it's better not to set the zram size to 100% for
> everyone. Whoever is sure that their data will be compressible can set
> it to 100%.
>
> > Are you sure that this data is compressed in memory as well as the
> > on-disk encoding? The editing operations themselves surely operate on
> > uncompressed data, and then it's compressed upon being written to
> > disk.
> I'm not sure. But I've had a few times where zram didn't compress
> anything and ended up freezing the system completely.

Is earlyoom disabled on this system? It should send SIGTERM to
something in this case - which is not the best UX as a hint that an
adjustment needs to be made. But I want to make sure there isn't
something else going wrong.


-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux