Re: F33: kernel 5.10.x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 4:31 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
<devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 08.01.2021 23:40, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote:
> > Just wondering whether there is a particular reason 5.10 kernel has not
> > been submitted for testing in bodhi for F33
>
> 5.10.x is full of regressions: BTRFS regressions[1] and now HDMI output
> regressions[2] on modern Intel processors.
>
> [1]:
> https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/kieqyu/warning_linux_510_has_a_500_to_2000_btrfs/
> [2]: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180543


There's a tentative fix being tested upstream. While I can reproduce
the problem, it's a pretty narrow workload (e.g. untar firefox
source). Launch, boot, updates, seem normal or faster compared to 5.9.
The effect is worse on SSD than HDD, making an SSD about as slow as a
HDD for the affected workload.

-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux