Re: Fedora 34 Change: Signed RPM Contents (late System-Wide Change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:41:05PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Will GPLv3 packages be excluded, or will the signing keys be provided
> upon request?

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#GiveUpKeys

    Q: I use public key cryptography to sign my code to assure its
       authenticity. Is it true that GPLv3 forces me to release my private
       signing keys?


    A: No. The only time you would be required to release signing keys is if
       you conveyed GPLed software inside a User Product, and its hardware
       checked the software for a valid cryptographic signature before it
       would function. In that specific case, you would be required to
       provide anyone who owned the device, on demand, with the key to sign
       and install modified software on the device so that it will run. If
       each instance of the device uses a different key, then you need only
       give each purchaser a key for that instance



-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux