Re: Stale proven packagers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2020-12-23 at 15:05 +0000, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:49 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Maybe Fedora should add 2FA support and require it for the most powerful
> > groups?
> > 
> 
> It does support it, but AFAIK does not require it.

old-FAS (the current one) has 2FA support and requires it for things
like root access on infra hosts.

There's at least one bug in the old-FAS 2FA implementation which makes
it close to useless, so it probably wouldn't be worth extending the
requirements for 2FA until new-FAS (based on AAA) is deployed. At that
point I think it would make sense to require packager accounts to have
a second factor, and require that second factor when getting a Kerberos
ticket and when changing the ssh keys on the account.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux