On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 3:24 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 12/18/20 3:28 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > We plan on only removing nodejs library leaves (packages that nothing
> > depends on for running or building).
>
> Thanks. That was not obvious from the proposal.
>
> > I've never ran that script looking for packages that nothing depends
> > on, and I'm not sure I'm looking at the output correctly.
> > Would I look at the "FTBFS (rawhide) (not depended on) (740):"
> > section? Are those the leaves?
>
> Either leaves or only needed by other leaves. If you remove the entire group at
> once, there *should* be no impact outside of that group (however, conditional
> requirements are not handled in a 100 % bulletproof way).
>
> > Anyway, there would be some variation on what you have there, if that
> > is correct. It would be more ...
> >
> > dnf repoquery --qf="%{source_name}" -a | grep ^nodejs- | grep -v
> > ^nodejs-packaging% | sort -u -o nodejs.sources
> > vi nodejs.sources # remove the non-noarch packages, any any others we need to
> > python3 find_unblocked_orphans.py --skip-orphans $(cat nodejs.sources)
>
> Just curious: Do you have some example of non-noarch nodejs package? I struggled
> to find one:
nodejs-bcrypt
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
