On 12/10/20 7:16 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: This again leads to a required architecture change. We really need to have a captive portal namespace, that handles all of this while the applications still consider the network is down. Once the captive portal has passed and our internet link is "clean", should this be bridged into the regular network namespace so applications see the network as "active". Any state of DNS/browser that was used inside the captive portal namespace is then destroyed (it is untrusted and unverifiable data)
That is how Android manages captive portals. Whoever created this captive portals concept should be slapped each day for ever, but that's where the world has gone. -- Roberto Ragusa mail at robertoragusa.it _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
