Re: How do really work RAID1 on btrfs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sergio Belkin wrote:
> So, let's say we have 3 small disks: 4GB, 3G, and 2GB.
> 
> If I create one file of 3GB I think that
> 3 GB is written on 4GB disk, it leaves 1 GB free.
> 3 GB  of copy is written on 3 GB disk, it leaves 0 GB Free.
> 
> So, I create one file of 1GB that is written on 4GB disk, it leaves 0 GB
> free.
> 1 GB of copy is written on 2 GB disk, so it leaves 1 GB free.
> 
> So I've used 4GB, ok it leaves 1 GB free on only one disk, but cannot be
> mirrored.
> 
> However as [1] I could use 4.5 ((4GB+3GB+2GB)/2) GB instead of 4GB.
> Surely, I'm missing or mistaking something.
> 
> Please could you help me?

The optimum size can theoretically be achieved by using the following 
physical partitioning:
* x GB on the 4 GB disk and the 3 GB disk,
* y GB on the 4 GB disk and the 2 GB disk, and
* z GB on the 3 GB disk and the 2 GB disk,
for a total of x+y+z GB, where x, y, and z solve the following system of 
equations:
* x+y=4
* x+z=3
* y+z=2
i.e., in standard form:
* 1x+1y+0z=4
* 1x+0y+1z=3
* 0x+1y+1z=2
The determinant of this system is -2, which is not 0, so this system admits 
a unique solution. It can be computed using any method to solve linear 
systems of equations, such as direct substitution (solving an equation for a 
variable and substituting it), Gauss elimination with back substitution, 
Gauss-Jordan (bidirectional) elimination, or Cramer's rule. The result is:
* x=2.5
* y=1.5
* z=0.5
for a total of x+y+z=2.5+1.5+0.5=4.5 GB.

Now how btrfs actually handles this in practice is a different story. 
Judging from Chris Murphy's reply, it does not precompute the above 
repartition, but tries to dynamically select 2 disks for each newly 
allocated 1 GB block to approximate the optimal solution for large enough 
drives (which will not achieve the optimum for the sizes in your example 
because the optimum allocation is not an integer amount of gigabytes, and 
will in fact be pretty far from the optimum due to the small sizes, whereas 
the larger the disk sizes, the less noticeable the loss is).

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux