Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 12:24:32PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 03:25:20PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:15:24PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:03 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
> > > > >
> > > > > == Summary ==
> > > > >
> > > > > This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the
> > > > > default git branch instead of "master". Specific repositories will be
> > > > > manually moved and default git branch for new projects will be set to
> > > > > use "main".
> > > > 
> > > > Is there a reason why "main" is proposed instead of "rawhide" on src.fp.o?
> > > > For all non-dist-git repositories I am fine with "main", but if we are
> > > > changing this anyway, "rawhide" would actually make more sense for
> > > > dist-git repos.
> > > 
> > > One of the argument was that not every namespace on dist-git has a rawhide
> > > version, for example containers do not have/use rawhide.
> > > And having different default branches on different namespaces is not very
> > > appealing.
> > 
> > I second the request to use "rawhide" for rawhide branches.
> > 
> > The way that branches in dist-git are used is very different from how
> > branches are used in the usual git repo, so I find the argument that
> > the same rules as in other repos should be used convincing. If we rename
> 
> Not convincing? :) 

Yeah, sorry. That sentence was clearly too long.

> > it to rawhide, we have the simple rule that "branch of a given name is
> > used to build for that Fedora release", without any further explanation
> > about one exception necessary.
> 
> Thats nice I guess, but it's still going to be more confusing for new
> users that would expect a main branch (after more things move to that
> around the world). 
> 
> I suppose we could split the difference and make main a ref to rawhide
> or vice versa?

That'd work for me.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux