> We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than raised the > question with regards to opencryptoki-tpmtok if it should be changed in > Fedora as well, so I thought I'd see what everyone thinks about future > TPM1.2 support in Fedora. I know at one point in the last year or so > trousers almost dropped from Fedora due to being orphaned for quite a > while. From what I could find the following packages have dependencies: > > ecryptfs-utils - --disable-tspi > openconnect - looks like it will only build support if trousers-devel is > there, and makes use of tpm2-tss as well. > strongswan - --enable-tss-tss2 instead of --enable-tss-trousers? > tboot - the trousers dependency was just in a policy tool that has now > been deprecated upstream. > opencryptoki-tpmtok - --disable-tpmtok > > tpm-quote-tools, tpm-tools, and trousers are all tpm1.2 specific > packages. > > Another thing is that in the kernel there currently is no way to build > with just tpm1.2 or tpm2.0 support so the kernel support for tpm1.2 > would still be there. > > I don't think Fedora needs to drop the tpm1.2 support if people want to > continue supporting it, but wanted to put the question out there and see > how everyone felt. I think it should be dropped, tpm2 has been shipped in hardware for 5+ years and tpm1 has security issues, so I think the time is now to drop it. Please do a Fedora Change proposal to ensure it's communicated properly. Peter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
