* Jan Pazdziora: > So do you recommend for fakechroot to hardcode something like > > --- a/src/libfakechroot.h > +++ b/src/libfakechroot.h > @@ -224,4 +224,14 @@ int fakechroot_try_cmd_subst (char *, const char *, char *); > int snprintf(char *, size_t, const char *, ...); > #endif > > +#ifndef _STAT_VER > +#if defined (__aarch64__) > +#define _STAT_VER 0 > +#elif defined (__x86_64__) > +#define _STAT_VER 1 > +#else > +#define _STAT_VER 3 > +#endif > +#endif > + > #endif > > for all the arches? Yes, the fakeroot case is really quite unusual, I think. >> There's a Fedora-specific hack in rawhide glibc to bring back the >> __xstat and related symbols for linking. This in the process of being >> upstreamed. > > Does that include __fxstatat64? And is the hack already in > glibc-2.32.9000-16.fc34 or is it on the way to rawhide? Looking at the current rawhide buildroot, it's already there: # eu-readelf --symbols=.dynsym /lib64/libc.so.6 | grep __fxstat64 1059: 00000000000f1880 84 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 15 __fxstat64@@GLIBC_2.2.5 The @@ means it's available for linking. It's missing from upstream right now, but we'll fix that before the upstream release. Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
