On 11/24/20 9:52 PM, Benjamin Berg wrote:
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 21:26 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 11/24/20 9:10 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rename_libusb_packages_and_deprecated_old_api
== Summary ==
Rename `libusb` to `libusb-compat` and `libusbx` to `libusb1`. Do
'''not''' provide an automated update path for the old `libusb`
build
dependency as packages should–and likely can–be updated to use
`libusb1`.
Please, don't name packages name-compat. See the guidelines on the
topic:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple
The upstream name of the library is "libusb-compat-0.1". So the
"compat" part would not be distribution specific in this case.
See https://github.com/libusb/libusb-compat-0.1
In that case, I guess it is fine, thou a bit confusing. Why not call it
libusb-compat-0.1?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
