On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 11:25:39AM -0000, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > ===== NOTE about xinetd ===== > > > > Many packagers are listed as affected by xinetd. The dependency chain is: > > > > cvs (kasal, ppisar) > > cvs-inetd.noarch requires xinetd > > > > git (amahdal, besser82, chrisw, pcahyna, pstodulk, skisela, tmz) > > git.src requires cvs > > git-cvs.noarch requires cvs > > > > <everything else> ( <everybody else>) > > <package> requires git > > > > Note that if xinetd indeed goes away, your package will most likely not be > > affected, unless you actually need git-cvs. > > > > ===== end NOTE ===== > > Also, git requires only the client functionality, not cvs-inetd itself. So > it would be good to get input from the former xinetd maintainer whether > - xinetd should be retired fro some reason (and cvs should retire the > cvs-inetd subpackage) > - or xinetd should simply be picked up. > I removed the cvs-inted subpackage from Fedora 34. Those who need to run a CVS server can use systemd cvs@.service activated by cvs.socket instead. I believe it's unlikely that somobody will adopt xinetd. It was orphaned because its maintainer orphaned all his packages. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
