Re: F34 Change proposal: MariaDB 10.5 (Self-Contained Change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 10:55 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Are there packages that require rebuilding? E.g. I see that some packages
> require libmariadbd.so.19. What is the plan regarding them?

Packages that require the server (embedded) library
"libmariadbd.so.19" are the only one that might need rebuild.
Currently this is only a single package 'amarok', so I can cooperate
with its maintainer if rebuild would be needed.

The changes between the server embedded library between MariaDB 10.4
and 10.5 shouldn't be significant, other than added functionality.
I have to check the ABI compatibility to be sure. If the functionality
would be only extended, the dependent package might not need rebuild
at all; though it still would get one during some mass rebuild.

I added my above reply to the Self Contained Change.

--

Michal Schorm
Software Engineer
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux