Re: EOL and Obsoletes in Modularity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 12:33:23PM +0100, Daniel Mach wrote:
> From DNF team's perspective, a packaging system is not complete without
> Obsoletes. That's why we believe module Obsoletes are a must have to ensure
> smooth system upgrades and regular updates on systems consuming Rawhide (or
> any other rolling stream). I created a Fedora Change[1] which got accepted
> already. We'll deliver support for module Obsoletes in DNF as soon as
> possible and we hope it's going to be used in Fedora 34 (or 35 at latest).
> 
[...]
> [1]
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes/Module_Obsoletes_and_EOL

Do you read a discussion for that page? Or where can I comment on the format
of the EOL data? 

-- Petr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux