* Daniel P. Berrangé: > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 11:58:32AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Daniel P. Berrangé: >> >> > In QEMU there's a desire to make use of BPF programs for implementing >> > some networking features. The current patches are proposing adding >> > prebuilt BPF byte code to the QEMU repo, with source available, but >> > not actually building from source during a build. >> > >> > I was wondering if we had any specific guidance or rules covering the >> > shipping BPF programs in particular ? >> >> Is this even technically feasible? I don't think the kernel presents a >> stable interface to BPF programs. > > I'm not sure to be honest, but I'll raise that as a question to the > patch submitter. I'm not very familiar with BPF, just saw the suggestion > to ship pre-built BPF bytecode and was concerned this would not be > acceptable for Fedora. Is this about ebpf/rss.bpf.c? It looks more like an attempt to bypass the Fedora kernel module policy. Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
