Re: FC4 and kernel 2.6.12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sure, you can block SYN packets and such like that. However, if it lakes
state, there are still plenty of ways to cause problems. Supposedly, I
believe I read it on LKM, 2.6.12 includes the netfilter/conntrack stuff
that has been in the works for while.

Yes, I probably should be more clear. However, in the past I have
mentioned the need for this specifically and was told to wait until it
was completed, well, it is, and it is being folded in.

So, rumor mongering no! Assuming too much, probably.

Trever

On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 19:55 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Sat, 07 May 2005 12:01:31 -0600, "Trever L. Adams" <tadams-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >  I have heard
> > that real firewalling for IPv6 is in the pre series for 2.6.12. [...]
> 
> Sounds like rumor-mongering for me.
> 
> > [] This is not some trivial thing. It is
> > something that has been needed for some time.
> 
> My firewall works just fine.
> 
> The thing is that I am, of course, ignorant about IPv6. But this
> "I heard ... real firewall" kind of thing is really very silly.
> Why don't you write specifically what functionality is missing?
> 
> -- Pete
> 
--
"Life is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel."
-- Unknown

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux