On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 22:42, Neal Gompa wrote: [...] > And there is *nothing* that stops the Change process for working in a > rolling context other than people don't think of doing it. > > There's actually nothing wrong with this idea in itself, because at > the crux of it is that there is a desire to have a side-tag to build > gcc11 with a limited compose to regression test and further evaluate > the development of GCC earlier. This is something I'd like to have > available for more things, and it's a great idea. But there is > basically no reason to stuff it into ELN other than it already exists > as a gap in our existing process. Instead, I'd like to have that > formally approved by FESCo in a way that releng would make a dedicated > side tag for it and allow OSCI to be configured for mini-composes for > the purpose of assisting in GCC development. Then it can be a regular > part of GCC rebase processes. This is very well said. +1. Thanks Neal! Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
