On Wed, Oct 21, 2020, 07:03 Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
* Fabio Valentini:
> Looks like the most recent glibc update in rawhide broke some stuff,
> including running dnf:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 57, in <module>
> from dnf.cli import main
> File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/__init__.py", line 30, in <module>
> import dnf.base
> File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/base.py", line 29, in <module>
> import libdnf.transaction
> File "/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/libdnf/__init__.py", line
> 12, in <module>
> from . import conf
> File "/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/libdnf/conf.py", line 13, in <module>
> from . import _conf
> ImportError: /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0: undefined symbol: lstat64,
> version GLIBC_2.33
>
> dnf not working is clearly bad because it will prevent users who get
> the broken glibc update from fixing things, right?
I'm pretty sure this is the result of *not* updating glibc. Did you
attempt a partial upgrade of rawhide, restricting the package set during
an update?
I cannot reproduce this: In the current compose and buildroot,
libglib-2.0.so.0 and libc.so.6 are consistent.
No, this error came up while running fedora-review. I'm pretty sure it only ever installs things to the mock chroot and doesn't do partial upgrades.
Fabio
Thanks,
Florian
--
Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
