Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/19/20 11:33 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
I guess those machines are more or less the cut-off point and slower machines
are not worth keeping around. But that means that there still are a ton
of BIOS machines worth keeping around.

Note that even most sandy bridge machines do not support UEFI and those
machines are still very capable.


I've got ~30 non-EFI Acer TimelineX Aspire 3820Ts, circa ~ 2009-10 still in 'production' across the enterprise. e.g.,

	dmesg | grep DMI:
		[    0.000000] DMI: Acer Aspire 3820/JM31_CP, BIOS V1.19 10/27/2010

They currently run (recently migrated)

	grep _NAME /etc/os-release
		PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 32 (Server Edition)"
		CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:32"

	uname -rm
		5.8.15-201.fc32.x86_64 x86_64

**ALL* have

	cat /proc/cpuinfo |grep "^model name"
		model name      : Intel(R) Core(TM) i3 CPU       M 370  @ 2.40GHz

, 8GB RAM

	free
				total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
	Mem:        7806944      673488     3105532      102896     4027924     6733392
	Swap:       8388604           0     8388604

, 500GB ssds,

	hwinfo --disk | grep Device:
		Device: "CT1000MX500SSD1"

and run

	libreoffice-x11-6.4.7.2-1.fc32.x86_64
	VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.14_140239_fedora32-1.x86_64 (Win10 guests)
	Firefox 81.0.2
	Thunderbird 78.3.3

as well as

	java --version
		openjdk 15 2020-09-15
		OpenJDK Runtime Environment 20.9 (build 15+36)
		OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 20.9 (build 15+36, mixed mode, sharing)

a number run

	PhpStorm 2020.3 EAP
	Build #PS-203.4818.52, built on October 15, 2020

&/or

	Eclipse Platform
	Version: 2020-03 (4.15)
	Build id: I20200305-0155

My own manages nginx/php & mariadb quite nicely as well.

Are these screamin' fast?  Do they have 8K screens to play video games on?  No.  Of course not.

But they are *perfectly* serviceable/functional; and that's just one model of 'oldies' around here.


All that^ is _still_ more 'juice' than many a VPS ... what it requires to make old boxes 'serve well' is some due diligence on right-sizing your kernel/app/server/tool/etc configs.  AND a distro (even if it's a DIY LFS ...) that makes it possible.


It really just is way too early / too soon to cut of BIOS booting support.

big emphasis on the 'way'.

i for one am certainly glad that that's the decision that's been taken, and that i won't have to face migrating to yet-another-OS because of bad enterprise policy decisions.

esp, since Fedora's grown on me  ...
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux