> >> This proposal was soundly rejected, so don't worry about it. > > > > That's great news. Thank you! > I am not thrilled that this has been rejected since efi support is not > so good on Fedora. How do you mean, it's supported quite well IMO with support for things like secure boot and UEFI capsule updates for updating system firmware I feel it's in quite good state with people improving on things constantly. > Devices that are BIOS can IIRC still use efi using a boot tool > installed to the MBR which emulates EFI > and than loads the EFI loader. This would be a one time step. Why bother, just adds an extra layer of complexity with no added benefits that UEFI provides. > Hopefully Fedora will have enough resources to support systemd-boot on > Fedora Silverblue, > which has never worked so far due to ostree naming conventions I see that less likely because of the need to have a already stretched team supporting yet another boot path. > https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/1951 > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
