On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 08:44, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12.10.2020 14:16, Neal Gompa wrote:
> 2. Having subpackages like this that conflict by name is going to get
> crazy really fast, so we need a virtual name to make RPM only permit
> one of them at a time.
Btw, why not to use the Alternatives system for the default text editor,
like Debian/Ubuntu does?
Philosophical differences between 'how an OS should work' going back to the earliest days. Boiling it down with a LOT of hyperbole, I would say:
Debian has usually taken a 'perl' approach to a problem: It doesn't matter how something is accomplished, as long as it's accomplished.
Red Hat Linux -> Fedora has usually taken a 'python' approach to a problem: There should be one opinionated way to do things and only when all else fails (java) allow for alternatives.
The Debian approach allows for the system administrator to have more selection in their tools but can lead to 'why in the world is this not working' as a user if you move from one systems administrator to another
The Red Hat/Fedora approach allows the user to have a smoother existence of moving from place to place, but tends to have sysadmins having to put in more work-arounds.
Neither one of these approaches is wrong, they are just different.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
