I don't think it's a good idea.
dnsmasq is not dns resolver but acts as DHCP and DNS server. It
provides VMs with IP
address/lease and create corresponding dns record for it. In case
of
resolved ip addresses and dns records must be managed either
manually
or... with dnsmasq.
On 2020-10-06 at 22:04 CEST, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote...
Hello,
In the network bridges that libvirt creates there's a dnsmasq
daemon to
resolve the VM's IPs. Is there any way to signal
systemd-resolved from
libvirt to say that in the bridge interface there is a DNS
server and a
domain?
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to
devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
Pavel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
