Re: new dnf mode of listing upgraded packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 09:17:46AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 9:15 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On rawhide:
> > $ sudo dnf upgrade
> > ========================================================================================================
> >  Package                            Arch   Version                         Repository              Size
> > ========================================================================================================
> > Installing:
> >  kernel-core                        x86_64 5.9.0-0.rc7.20201002git.24.fc34 fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug
> >                                                                                                    32 M
> >  kernel-modules                     x86_64 5.9.0-0.rc7.20201002git.24.fc34 fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug
> >                                                                                                    30 M
> > Upgrading:
> >  NetworkManager                     x86_64 1:1.26.2-2.fc34                 rawhide                2.2 M
> >      replacing  NetworkManager.x86_64 1:1.26.2-1.fc34.1
> >  NetworkManager-libnm               x86_64 1:1.26.2-2.fc34                 rawhide                1.6 M
> >      replacing  NetworkManager-libnm.x86_64 1:1.26.2-1.fc34.1
> >  NetworkManager-team                x86_64 1:1.26.2-2.fc34                 rawhide                 31 k
> >      replacing  NetworkManager-team.x86_64 1:1.26.2-1.fc34.1
> >  NetworkManager-wifi                x86_64 1:1.26.2-2.fc34                 rawhide                 99 k
> >      replacing  NetworkManager-wifi.x86_64 1:1.26.2-1.fc34.1
> >  OpenIPMI-libs                      x86_64 2.0.29-1.fc34                   rawhide                524 k
> >      replacing  OpenIPMI-libs.x86_64 2.0.28-6.fc33
> >  abrt                               x86_64 2.14.4-2.fc34                   rawhide                497 k
> >      replacing  abrt.x86_64 2.14.2-5.fc33
> >  abrt-addon-ccpp                    x86_64 2.14.4-2.fc34                   rawhide                132 k
> >      replacing  abrt-addon-ccpp.x86_64 2.14.2-5.fc33
> >  abrt-addon-kerneloops              x86_64 2.14.4-2.fc34                   rawhide                 50 k
> >      replacing  abrt-addon-kerneloops.x86_64 2.14.2-5.fc33
> >  abrt-addon-pstoreoops              x86_64 2.14.4-2.fc34                   rawhide                 26 k
> >      replacing  abrt-addon-pstoreoops.x86_64 2.14.2-5.fc33
> >  abrt-addon-vmcore                  x86_64 2.14.4-2.fc34                   rawhide                 37 k
> >      replacing  abrt-addon-vmcore.x86_64 2.14.2-5.fc33
> >  abrt-addon-xorg                    x86_64 2.14.4-2.fc34                   rawhide                 41 k
> >      replacing  abrt-addon-xorg.x86_64 2.14.2-5.fc33
> >  abrt-cli                           x86_64 2.14.4-2.fc34                   rawhide                 16 k
> >  abrt-dbus                          x86_64 2.14.4-2.fc34                   rawhide                 72 k
> >      replacing  abrt-dbus.x86_64 2.14.2-5.fc33
> >
> > Most packages that are upgraded are shown as "replacing" themselves. This is
> > technically true, but this mode of listing is very verbose. But not all packages
> > that are upgraded are listed like that, so I think there must be some additional
> > variable I'm missing?
> >
> > (This output takes a lot of space and is hard to scan quickly, so I can't say I
> > quite like it.)
> >
> > (dnf-4.2.23-2.fc33.noarch)
> >
> 
> "replacing" stanzas show up if Obsoletes are declared. That's how DNF
> tells you something is Obsoleting something else.

Not in this case. It turns out I had many duplicated packages on this system.
dnf seems to be saying that the upgrade is upgrading the newer
version of the package and removing the dup at the same time.
I think so, the output doesn't make this obvious.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux