On 4/16/20 5:43 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 07:41:07AM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: >> >> Really, it may be best to go about this in the same way as Ubuntu, with nss- >> dns instead of nss-resolve.. Editing /etc/resolv.conf is still commonly done >> on Fedora, especially on servers. In fact, I never knew that NetworkManager >> would clobber that until this thread. If this isn't mean to wreck everyone's >> systems, backwards compatibility is key. > > Relying on nss_dns causes bugs like > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1624320 > (systemd-resolved appends 127.0.0.53 to resolv.conf alongside existing > entries). > It still gets (angry) comments, years after it was filled. > It is not nss_dns use, which makes angry comments from people. It should not be pushed into nameservers list when its broken. It should be possible to use resolved just for mdns and llmnr and leave dns for proper servers. If it were opt-in and not opt-out, no annoyed comments would be required. -- Petr Menšík Software Engineer Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/ email: pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
